skyfaller: (Default)
[personal profile] skyfaller
Could it be that consumerism and escapism destroy intelligent races before we can make contact with them? Is that why we haven't found any space aliens yet? If so, what can we do to avoid that fate?

Perhaps Reverend Billy and the Church of Stop Shopping will save us all. Maybe we'll need something a little more radical than that. At any rate, if Geoffrey Miller is right, something must be done.

Date: 2006-01-03 08:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] deaminerva.livejournal.com
The conditions which allowed intelligent life to evolve in this universe are difficult to replicate. You've got to have a planet close enough to a star to receive enough warmth to develop life, but you can't overbake the planet. Thus, you have to have the right combination of temperature of star and distance between planet to star. Also, that planet has got to have the right compounds to lead to life and your planet has to have an atmosphere. Gaseous planets wouldn't work because of the huge atmospheric pressure, which leads to destructive storms and electric charges. And then, to get actually intelligent life, we'd need some sort of evolutionary process, which we think is tied to having an atmosphere and a medium like water (or possibly methane). Given enough possibilities (say, in a universe), yes, there almost has to be intelligent life out there. However, it might be on the other side of the universe. The speed of light barrier sure is pesky.

I mean, Miller had some interesting points about consumerism, but the whole beginning of the article, insinuating that it really is a mystery that there aren't other planets in our galaxy with intelligent life on them, is faulty. Sorry to nitpick.

February 2009

S M T W T F S
1 234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 24th, 2025 03:16 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios